Excitonium is the newest form of matter discovered; it was in the realm of theory for nearly 50 years

Scientists have proven the existence of a new form of matter called excitonium – which was first theorised almost 50 years ago. Researchers from the University of California Berkeley and University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in the US studied non-doped crystals of the transition metal dichalcogenide titanium diselenide (1T-TiSe2).
Artist's depiction of the collective excitons of an excitonic solid. Image: Peter Abbamonte, U. of I. Department of Physics and Frederick Seitz Materials Research Laboratory
Artist's depiction of the collective excitons of an excitonic solid. Image: Peter Abbamonte, U. of I. Department of Physics and Frederick Seitz Materials Research Laboratory
Excitonium is a condensate – it exhibits macroscopic quantum phenomena, like a superconductor. It is made up of excitons, particles that are formed in a very strange quantum mechanical pairing, namely that of an escaped electron and the hole it left behind.
It defies reason, but it turns out that when an electron, seated at the edge of a crowded-with-electrons valence band in a semiconductor, gets excited and jumps over the energy gap to the otherwise empty conduction band, it leaves behind a “hole” in the valence band. That hole behaves as though it were a particle with a positive charge, and it attracts the escaped electron.
When the escaped electron with its negative charge, pairs up with the hole, the two remarkably form a composite particle, a boson – an exciton. In point of fact, the hole’s particle-like attributes are due to the collective behaviour of the surrounding crowd of electrons. However, that understanding makes the pairing no less strange and wonderful, researchers said.
Until now, scientists have not had the experimental tools to positively distinguish whether what looked like excitonium was not, in fact, a Peierls phase. Peierls phases and exciton condensation share the same symmetry and similar observables.
Abbamonte and his team were able to overcome that challenge by using a novel technique they developed called momentum-resolved electron energy-loss spectroscopy (M-EELS). With their new technique, the group was able to measure collective excitations of the low-energy bosonic particles, the paired electrons and holes, regardless of their momentum.
“Ever since the term ‘excitonium’ was coined in the 1960s by Harvard theoretical physicist Bert Halperin, physicists have sought to demonstrate its existence,” said Peter Abbamonte, a professor at the University of Illinois. “Theorists have debated whether it would be an insulator, a perfect conductor, or a superfluid – with some convincing arguments on all sides,” Abbamonte said.
“Since the 1970s, many experimentalists have published evidence of the existence of excitonium, but their findings were not definitive proof and could equally have been explained by a conventional structural phase transition,” he said. The findings, published in the journal Science, holds great promise for unlocking further quantum mechanical mysteries, researchers said.
It could also shed light on the metal-insulator transition in band solids, in which exciton condensation is believed to play a part. Beyond that, possible technological applications of excitonium are purely speculative.
Dr. Joseph Mercola: You could be ignoring one of the biggest causes of vision loss: light bulbs. Here’s what everyone needs to know about the science of LED lights and the hidden threat they pose to your body.
Speaking of Science

Please stop annoying this NASA scientist with your ridiculous Planet X doomsday theories

4:01
NASA scientist debunks Nibiru
Embed
Share
NASA senior scientist David Morrison explains why there is no such thing as a planet called Nibiru.
David Morrison is a real NASA scientist who studies real planets and makes real discoveries about the real universe.
Unfortunately for him, Morrison’s duties also include debunking perennial Internet theories that a fake planet is about to destroy the Earth, which was supposed to happen in 2003, then 2012, then Sept. 23, then October — and now the world is supposed to end again some time Sunday.
And Morrison sounds like he’s just about had it.
“You’re asking me for a logical explanation of a totally illogical idea,” the senior NASA scientist said on this week’s SETI Institute podcast, after the hosts asked for his take on third scheduled apocalypse in three months. “There is no such planet, there never has been, and presumably there never will be — but it keeps popping up over and over.”
We can understand his frustration. Based on just enough pseudoscience to capture the popular imagination, the theory claims that a planet (or “black star”) called Nibiru (or Planet X) is orbiting the outer fringes of our solar system. It’s just far enough out there that no one can prove it exists, of course, but also happens to be on a path that will soon send it careening toward Earth — either to smash into us cause a gravitational doomsday.
“I assumed that Nibiru was the sort of Internet rumor that would quickly pass,” Morrison wrote in 2008, after his “Ask an Astrobiologist” website had become inundated with predictions that Nibiru was going to cross paths with Earth in 2012.
“I now receive at least one question per day, ranging from anguished (‘I can’t sleep; I am really scared; I don’t want to die’) to the abusive (‘Why are you lying; you are putting my family at risk; if NASA denies it then it must be true.’)” he wrote.
Morrison laid out a detailed explanation, which he would repeat in years to come: There is no evidence that Nibiru exists; if it did exist, it would have screwed up the outer planets’ orbits long ago; and people have predicted its arrival before and been wrong.
Of course, logic didn’t work. Thousands of panicky emails poured in to NASA as the 2012 supposed dooms date approached, Morrison said on the podcast. The agency was internally split over whether to respond, lest it legitimize nonsense, and eventually the director of NASA decided something had to be done.
Thus was Morrison — whose has worked on NASA’s Voyager, Galileo and Kepler missions in his decades long career — forced to make YouTube videos for frightened children.
“I got a note from a 12-year-old girl. She said she and her classmates were scared,” he said in a 2011 video. “The simplest thing to say is there is no evidence whatsoever from the existence of Nibiru.”
Sure enough, no phantom star disrupted Earth’s orbit in 2012.
Sure enough, the fear of it continued to disrupt Morrison’s work up to the present day.
As Kristine Phillips wrote for The Washington Post, a conspiracy theorist put a biblical spin on the Nibiru theory this year, claiming to have deduced from the Book of Revelation that it would set off a spasm of earthquakes, volcanic eruptions and tidal waves beginning on Sept. 23.
September passed. The theorist’s revised date, Oct. 15, also came and went uneventfully.
But tabloids and YouTube cranks simply moved on to other theorists with other soon-ish dooms dates. The most recent was a blogger who predicted that Nibiru, the sun and the Earth will all line up and cause a cataclysmic series earthquakes on Sunday.
That’s why you can now read a Newsweek article, — “HOW TO PREPARE IF CONSPIRACY THEORISTS ARE RIGHT” — and any number of tabloids warnings about armageddon, yet again.
And that’s just the headlines. Nibiru theories have by now become so abundant that if you spend long enough on YouTube or PlanetXNews.com you can find an apocalypse scheduled for just about any given day of the week.
And that’s why Morrison was on the SETI podcast this week, distracted from his science once again to talk about a world that never stops failing to end.
“I got a phone call the other day,” Morrison said. “The world was supposed to end Saturday. The man asked, ‘Should I ought to work on Saturday, or stay home with my family?’ ”
He didn’t say how he answered. At this point, does it even matter?
Related Coverage
AI could 'replace humans altogether': Professor Stephen Hawking warns that robots will soon be a 'new form of life ...
Highly Cited Daily Mail 2 Nov 2017

LACK OF INTELLIGENCE CAUSED INDIA TO GO BACKWARDS IN THE LAST 1 YEAR

Huge 'monster' planet could challenge scientists' theory of how worlds form

| The Independent | Updated: Nov 2, 2017, 16:07 IST

Highlights

  • The planet, known as NGTS-1b, is the size of Jupiter, but it orbits around a red dwarf star that's only half the size of its sun.
  • The mysterious, challenging solar system is 600 light years from Earth and the ratio between the star and the planet is the most unusual ever discovered.
This image released on October 31, 2017 by the University of Warwick shows an artist's impression of planet NGTS-1b with its neighbouring sun. (AFP photo)This image released on October 31, 2017 by the University of Warwick shows an artist's impression of planet NG... Read More
A huge "monster" planet that's far too big for its sun could lead scientists to rethink their theories of astronomy.

The planet, known as NGTS-1b, is the size of Jupiter, but it orbits around a red dwarf star that's only half the size of its sun.

Scientists not only didn't predict that such a massive planet would be able to orbit such a small star, but it contradicts some of the predictions at the heart of their understanding of how planets form. The mysterious, challenging solar system is 600 light years from Earth and the ratio between the star and the planet is the most unusual ever discovered.

Dr Daniel Bayliss, from the University of Warwick, who led the team of astronomers, said: "The discovery of NGTS-1b was a complete surprise to us. Such massive planets were not thought to exist around such small stars.

"We are already challenging the received wisdom of how planets form. Our challenge is to now find out how common these types of planets are in the galaxy."

NGTS-1b was spotted using the Next-Generation Transit Survey (NGTS), a robotic array of telescopes in Chile's Atacama desert designed to search for exoplanets passing in front of their parent stars. The "hot Jupiter" gas giant is very close to its star, just 3 per cent of the distance between the Earth and the sun, and makes one orbit every 2.6 days. It has a surface temperature of around 530C.

Professor Peter Wheatley, also from the University of Warwick, who heads the NGTS, said: "NGTS-1b was difficult to find, despite being a monster of a planet, because its parent star is small and faint. Small stars are actually the most common in the universe, so it is possible that there are many of these giant planets waiting to found. Having worked for almost a decade to develop the NGTS telescope array, it is thrilling to see it picking out new and unexpected types of planets."

(A report on the discovery is due to appear in the journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.)

Robots might replace humans in future, warns Stephen Hawking

Researchers from Columbia University may have just replaced the need for dental implants!

A spacecraft graveyard exists in the middle of the ocean - here's what's down there

point nemo oceanic pole of inaccessibility google maps usgs nasa noaa labeled thumbGoogle Earth; Business Insider
  • Large satellites, space stations, and other objects can pose a threat when they fall to the ground.
  • As a result, many nations de-orbit old spacecraft over the most remote place on Earth, called Point Nemo.
  • This "spacecraft cemetery" is about 1,450 miles away from any piece of land and home to hundreds of dead satellites.
  • Space agencies and companies are concerned about space junk and working on ways to prevent its formation and clean it up.


The most remote location on Earth has many names: It's called Point Nemo (Latin for "no one") and the Oceanic Pole of Inaccessibility. Most precisely, its exact coordinates are 48 degrees 52.6 minutes south latitude and 123 degrees 23.6 minutes west longitude.
The spot is about 1,450 nautical miles from any spot of land - and the perfect place to dump dead or dying spacecraft, which is why its home to what NASA calls its "spacecraft cemetery."
"It's in the Pacific Ocean and is pretty much the farthest place from any human civilization you can find," NASA said.
Bill Ailor, an aerospace engineer and atmospheric reentry specialist, put it another way: "It's a great place you can put things down without hitting anything," he said.
To "bury" something in the cemetery, space agencies have to time a crash over that spot. Smaller satellites don't generally end up at Point Nemo, since, as NASA explains , "the heat from the friction of the air burns up the satellite as it falls toward Earth at thousands of miles per hour. Ta-da! No more satellite."
The problem is larger objects, like Tiangong-1: the first Chinese space station, which launched in September 2011 and weighs about 8.5 tons.
china tiangong 1 space station model reutersJason Lee/ReutersA scale model of China's Tiangong-1 space station.
China lost control of the 34-foot-long orbital laboratory in March 2016, and it is now doomed to crash by early 2018.
Where, exactly? No one yet knows. Ailor, who works for the nonprofit Aerospace Corporation, said his company likely won't generate a forecast until five days before the space station is expected to break apart in Earth's atmosphere.
When it does, hundreds of pounds of the spacecraft - like titanium scaffolding and glass-fiber-wrapped fuel tanks - could be falling at more than 180 miles per hour before slamming into the ground.
Since China doesn't have control of Tiangong-1, it can't assure the space station will disintegrate over Point Nemo.

The dead-spacecraft dumping zone

Astronauts living aboard the International Space Station actually live closer to the graveyard of spacecraft than anyone else. This is because the ISS orbits about 250 miles above Earth - and Point Nemo, when the orbital laboratory flies overhead. (The nearest island, meanwhile, is much farther away.)
Between 1971 and mid-2016, space agencies all over the world dumped at least 260 spacecraft into the region, according to Popular Science. That tally has risen significantly since the year 2015, when the total was just 161, per Gizmodo .
Buried under more than two miles of water is the Soviet-era MIR space station, more than 140 Russian resupply vehicles, several of the European Space Agency's cargo ships (like the Jules Verne ATV), and even a SpaceX rocket, according to Smithsonian.com .
jules verne atv fireball breaking apart atmospheric reentry artificial meteor esaNASA/ESA/Bill Moede and Jesse CarpenterESA's Jules Verne ATV breaks apart into a fireball while reentering Earth's atmosphere on September 29, 2008.
These dead spacecraft aren't neatly tucked together, though.
Ailor said a large object like Tiangong-1 can break apart into an oval-shaped footprint of debris that extends 1,000 miles long and dozens of miles wide. Meanwhile, the land-free zone around Point Nemo stretches more than 6.6 million square miles - so paying your respects to a specific item isn't easy.
While not all spacecraft wind up in the cemetery, the chances are extremely slim that anyone would get hit by debris regardless of where the spacecraft break up on Earth, Ailor said.
"It's not impossible, but since the beginning of the space age .... a woman who was brushed on the shoulder in Oklahoma is the only one we're aware of who's been touched by a piece of space debris," he said.
A bigger risk is leaving dead spacecraft in orbit.

The pernicious threat of space junk

space junk debris field earth orbit esaESAAn illustration of space junk. Satellites and debris are not to scale.
Some 4,000 satellites currently orbit Earth at various altitudes. There's space for more - even the 4,425 new internet-providing satellites that Elon Musk and SpaceX wish to launch in the near future.
But it's getting crowded up there when considering the threat of space junk .
In addition to all those satellites, there are thousands of uncontrolled rocket bodies orbiting earth, along with more than 12,000 artificial objects larger than a fist, according to Space-Track.org. That's not to mention countless screws, bolts, flecks of paint, and bits of metal.
"Countries have learned over the years that when they create debris, it presents a risk to their own systems just as it does for everybody else," Ailor said.
The worst kind of risk, according to the European Space Agency , is when a piece of space junk accidentally hits another piece, especially if the objects are large.
Such satellite collisions are rare but do happen; one occurred in 1996, another in 2009, and two in 2013. These accidents - along with the intentional destruction of space satellites - have generated countless pieces of space debris that can threaten satellites in nearby orbits years later, leading to a kind of runaway effect.
"We've figured out that this debris can stay up there for hundreds of years," Ailor said.

Getting old spacecraft out of orbit is a key to preventing the formation of space junk, and many space agencies and corporations now build spacecraft with systems to de-orbit them (and land them in the spacecraft cemetery).
But Ailor and others are pushing for the development of new technologies and methods that can lasso, bag, tug, and otherwise remove the old, uncontrolled stuff that's already up there and continues to pose a threat.
"I've proposed something like an XPRIZE or a Grand Challenge, where would you identify three spacecraft and give a prize to an entity to remove those things," he said.
The most important hurdle to clear, though, may be politics on Earth.
"It's not just a technical issue. This idea of ownership gets to be a real player here," Ailor said. "No other nation has permission to touch a US satellite, for instance. And if we went after a satellite ... it could even be deemed an act of war."
Ailor said someone needs to get nations together to agree on a treaty that spells out laws-of-the-sea-like salvage rights to dead or uncontrollable objects in space.
"There needs to be something where nations and commercial [companies] have some authority to go after something," he said.

Related Coverage
1:01
Astronomers Detect Black Hole Collision More Than 1.5 Billion Years Ago
NewsBeat Social


Fourth gravitational wave is detected

Mysteries of the universe:A 3km-long arm that is part of the Virgo detector for gravitational waves.AFPAFP  

European equipment records ripple

A fourth gravitational wave has been detected — this time with help from Italy-based equipment — after two black holes collided, sending ripples through the fabric of space and time, researchers said.
Gravitational waves were predicted by Albert Einstein a century ago as part of his theory of general relativity, but the first hard evidence of their existence came only in 2015, when two U.S. detectors found the first such signal.
The latest space-time ripples were detected on August 14 at 10:30 GMT when two giant black holes with masses about 31 and 25 times the mass of the Sun merged about 1.8 billion light-years away.
Spinning black hole
“The newly produced spinning black hole has about 53 times the mass of our Sun,” said a statement from the international scientists at Virgo detector, located at the European Gravitational Observatory (EGO) in Cascina, near Pisa, Italy.
“While this new event is of astrophysical relevance, its detection comes with an additional asset: this is the first significant gravitational wave signal recorded by the Virgo detector.”
The Virgo detector — an underground L-shaped instrument that tracks gravitational waves using the physics of laser light and space — recently underwent an upgrade, and while still less sensitive than its U.S. counterparts, it was able to confirm the same signal.
Known as interferometers, these high-tech underground stations do not rely on light in the sky like a telescope does, but instead sense vibrations in space and can pick up the “chirp” created by a gravitational wave.
“It is wonderful to see a first gravitational-wave signal in our brand new Advanced Virgo detector only two weeks after it officially started taking data,” said Virgo spokesperson Jo van den Brand of Nikhef and Vrije Universiteit (VU) University Amsterdam.
Previously, gravitational waves have been found using two U.S.-based detectors, known as the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) detectors in Livingston, Louisiana, and Hanford, Washington.
The first was found in September 2015 and announced to the public in early 2016, a historic achievement after decades of scientific research.
LIGO is funded by the National Science Foundation in the U.S. and operated by the California Institute of Technology and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Global network
The Virgo collaboration includes more than 280 physicists and engineers belonging to 20 different European research groups.
“This is just the beginning of observations with the network enabled by Virgo and LIGO working together,” said David Shoemaker, MIT’s spokesman for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.


























































From New York To London In 29 Minutes, SpaceX's Elon Musk Unveils Plan[[mumbai south to virar 3 hours+accidents]]

Related Coverage
3:01
Watch Elon Musk reveal SpaceX's most detailed plans to colonize Mars
Tech Insider
Mars 2024? Here's what to know about Elon Musk's mind-boggling space plan
Opinion The San Diego Union-Tribune 4h ago

From New York To London In 29 Minutes, SpaceX's Elon Musk Unveils Plan

In addition to helping create a city on the Red Planet, he said the next rocket he intends to build would also be capable of helping create a base camp on the moon - and flying people across the globe.

44 Shares
EMAIL
PRINT
4COMMENTS
From New York To London In 29 Minutes, SpaceX's Elon Musk Unveils Plan
An artist's rendering shows Elon Musk's plans for SpaceX's Mars City

Highlights

  1. Elon Musk has expanded his ambitions from just building a city on Mars
  2. Through SpaceX, he also wants to create a base camp on the moon
  3. He also said super fast transport between global cities could be achieved
For years, Elon Musk has been focused on building a colony on Mars. It's why he founded SpaceX in 2002, and it's been the driving force behind it ever since.

But during a speech in Adelaide, Australia, Friday morning, Musk said he has dramatically expanded his already-outsize ambitions. In addition to helping create a city on the Red Planet, he said the next rocket he intends to build would also be capable of helping create a base camp on the moon - and flying people across the globe.

"It's 2017, we should have a lunar base by now," he said during a 40-minute speech at the International Astronautical Congress. "What the hell has been going on?"

In a surprise twist, he also said the massive rocket and spaceship, which would have more pressurized passenger space than an Airbus A380 airplane, could also fly passengers anywhere on Earth in less than an hour. Traveling at a maximum speed of more than 18,000 mph, a trip from New York to Shanghai, for example, would take 39 minutes, he said. New York to London could be done in 29 minutes.

"If we're building this thing to go to the moon and Mars, why not go other places as well?" he said.

The speech was billed as an update to one he gave a year ago, in which he provided details for how SpaceX would make humanity a "multi-planet species."
 
spacex sattellite wp
An artist's rendering shows a SpaceX satellite in flight
At the speech a year ago, Musk unveiled a behemoth of a rocket that was so ambitious and mind-bogglingly large that critics said it was detached from reality. Now, he and his team at SpaceX have done some editing, and Musk presented a revised plan early Friday to build a massive, but more reasonably sized, rocket that he calls the BFR, or Big [expletive] Rocket.

"I think we've figured out how to pay for it, this is very important," he said.

The new fully reusable system includes a booster stage and a spaceship capable of carrying 100 people or so. It would be capable of flying astronauts and cargo on an array of missions, from across the globe, to the International Space Station in low Earth orbit and to the moon and Mars in deep space. It'd also be capable of launching satellites, he said, while effectively replacing all of the rockets and spacecraft SpaceX currently uses or is developing, making them redundant.

That would allow the company to put all of its resources into development of the BFR, he said.

Earlier this year, Musk announced that SpaceX would fly two private citizens in a trip around the moon by late next year. And he hinted at the moon base during a conference in July.

If you want to get the public really fired up, I think we've got to have a base on the moon. That'd be pretty cool. And then going beyond there and getting people to Mars," he said. "That's the continuance of the dream of Apollo that I think people are really looking for."

But Friday morning he made it clear that Mars is still the ultimate goal. During his talk, a chart showed that SpaceX planned to fly two cargo missions to Mars by 2022, a very ambitious timeline.
"That's not a typo," he said, but allowed: "It is aspirational."
 
spacex moon base
Another rendering shows Elon Musk's plan for a base on the moon
By 2024, he said the company could fly four more ships to Mars, two with human passengers and two more cargo-only ships.

SpaceX has upended the space industry, and Musk, with his celebrity, bravado and business acumen, has reignited interest in space. The company, which has won more than $4 billion in contracts from NASA, was the first commercial venture to send a spacecraft to the International Space Station; previously it had only been done by governments. It currently flies cargo there, and is also under contract from NASA to fly astronauts there, which could happen as early as next year.

But despite all its triumphs, the company still hasn't flown a single human to space, not even to low Earth orbit, let alone Mars, which on average is 140 million miles from Earth (though the planets come to within 35 million miles of each other every 26 months).

The travel between cities on Earth would also face substantial hurdles. In addition to the technological challenges, there would have to be regulatory approval from the Federal Aviation Administration.

Musk's speech comes two days after NASA announced that it had signed an agreement with Roscosmos, the Russian space agency, to study exploration in the vicinity of the moon under a plan called the "Deep Space Gateway" that could, eventually, lead to a habitat near the moon.

Lockheed Martin also unveiled a plan for deep space exploration Thursday, updating its "Mars Base Camp" system, a massive orbiting laboratory. Now the company says it could also build a lander capable of touching down on Mars or the moon. The company said it could launch within a decade in conjunction with NASA.

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)